Skip to main content

  877.543.5970 ext. 102   christopher@atlasindicators.com
  •  
  •   Client Login

  • Home
  • About 
    • Our Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Process
  • Our Services 
    • Our Services
    • Investments
    • Insurance
    • Retirement Planning
  • Resources 
    • Useful Websites
    • Financial Calculators
    • Video Library
  • Blog
  • Contact

    You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blogs
  3. Clear of the Nadir

Clear of the Nadir

Submitted by Atlas Indicators Investment Advisors on May 31st, 2024

Generations generally want the next to inherit a world and life better than they received.  Some worry that this stopped with the Baby Boomers.  While either side of the debate can likely be made, today we’ll look at some research from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) which could push against the notion that the Boomers had it best in economic terms. 

 

Rate of change could be a point of confusion when thinking about passing the baton from one cohort to the next.  For instance, this article authored by Kevin Corinth of AEI and Jeff Larimore of the Federal Reserve Board suggests that the past four generations have all had it better than their predecessors but defining the amount “better” is the issue.  The researchers used an inflation-adjusted, after-tax and post-transfer income measure, so it accounts for cost-of-living differences and includes take-home pay as well as social benefits from the government during ages 36-40.

 

Millennials are the latest group to enter into the age bracket analyzed.  This cohort is 18 percent better off than their Generation X counterparts.  While this is a slower improvement compared to the Silent Generation which was 34 percent better than the Greatest Generation nor as good as the Baby Boomers who were 27 percent better off than their parents, it improved upon the 16 percent increase Generation X experienced. 

 

It is early, but the data thus far looks promising for the newest generation in the workforce: Gen Z.  According to this article from the Economist, hourly wages for those aged 16-24 is up 13.0 percent year-over-year, outpacing the 6.0 percent average for those in the 25-54 age range.  When Boomers were 25, their annual household income was less half that of similarly aged members of Gen Z (adjusted for inflation of course).  There are also indications that Gen Z works fewer hours than Millennials did at 25, and that they spend slightly less on housing and education (including interest) than those immediately before them.

 

The rate of change seems to have bottomed with Generation X.  Young adults today are better off financially at an early stage in life, so it is not wild to think this could bring about future prosperity as they mature and earn (and spend) even more.  There is a lot of gloom in the media these days, but it looks like the slowest generational rate of change is in the rearview mirror, offering some cause for optimism.

Tags:
  • Federal Reserve

Book a Meeting

Tell a Friend

Looking to learn more?

Get in touch today

Contact Us

Additional info

  • Sitemap
  • Legal, privacy, copyright and trademark information

Contact info

  •   560 W Foothill Pkwy, Corona, CA 92882
  •   877.543.5970 ext. 102
  •   christopher@atlasindicators.com

Investment Advisory Services offered through Independent Advisor Representatives of Cooper McManus, a Registered Investment Adviser Securities offered through Registered Representatives of Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a broker-dealer, member FINRA/SIPC, to residents of: CA, HI, MA, MT, OR, PA, and TX. Cambridge and Atlas Indicators Investment Advisors, Inc. are not affiliated.​

Cambridge's Form CRS (Client Relationship Summary)

Please see the following for our services disclaimer: Asset Allocation: Diversification seeks to reduce the volatility of a portfolio by investing in a variety of asset classes. Neither asset allocation nor diversification guarantee against market loss or greater or more consistent returns. Asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protection from losses in a declining market. Precious Metals: Investments in precious metals such as gold involve risk. Investments in precious metals are not suitable to everyone and may involve loss of your entire investment. These investments are subject to sudden price fluctuation, possible insolvency of the trading exchange and potential losses of more than your original investment when using leverage. Real Estate: Specific-sector investing such as real estate can be subject to different and greater risks than more diversified investments. Declines in the value of real estate, economic conditions, property taxes, tax laws, and interest rates all present potential risks to real estate investments. Diversification: Diversification seeks to reduce the volatility of a portfolio by investing in a variety of asset classes. Neither asset allocation nor diversification guarantee against market loss or greater or more consistent returns. Index: An investor cannot invest directly in an index.

This site is published for residents of the United States and is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security or product that may be referenced herein. Persons mentioned on this website may only offer services and transact business and/or respond to inquiries in states or jurisdictions in which they have been properly registered or are exempt from registration. Not all products and services referenced on this site are available in every state, jurisdiction or from every person listed.

© 2025 Atlas Indicators Investment Advisors. All rights reserved.

Website Design For Financial Services Professionals